<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
  <channel>
    <title>Oxford Internet Institute</title>
    <link>http://odeo.com./channels/2119490-Oxford-Internet-Institute</link>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <description>Lectures and seminars from the Oxford Internet Institute (OII), University of Oxford. The OII is a leading world centre for multidisciplinary research and teaching on the social factors that are shaping the Internet, and their implications for society. Areas covered by our podcasts include: social networking, Internet regulation, safety and security online, e-government and democracy, civil society, open access, identity, e-learning, citizen journalism and new media, and the future of the Internet itself.</description>
    <itunes:summary>Lectures and seminars from the Oxford Internet Institute (OII), University of Oxford. The OII is a leading world centre for multidisciplinary research and teaching on the social factors that are shaping the Internet, and their implications for society. Areas covered by our podcasts include: social networking, Internet regulation, safety and security online, e-government and democracy, civil society, open access, identity, e-learning, citizen journalism and new media, and the future of the Internet itself.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:subtitle>Lectures and seminars from the Oxford Internet Institute (OII), University of Oxford. The OII is a leading world centre for multidisciplinary research and teaching on the social factors that are shaping the Internet, and their implications for society. Areas covered by our podcasts include: social networking, Internet regulation, safety and security online, e-government and democracy, civil society, open access, identity, e-learning, citizen journalism and new media, and the future of the Internet itself.</itunes:subtitle>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <itunes:image href="http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/images/podcasts/oii.png"/>
    <image url="http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/images/podcasts/oii.png" link="http://odeo.com./channels/2119490-Oxford-Internet-Institute" title="Oxford Internet Institute"/>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:56:53 -0800</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:56:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <category>Formal Education</category>
    <itunes:category text="Education">
      <itunes:category text="Higher Education"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <title>National Broadband Policies: Perspectives from the US and Britain</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25446265-National-Broadband-Policies-Perspectives-from-the-US-and-Britain</link>
      <description>Robert Hahn discusses his recent paper responding to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national US broadband plan Robert Hahn discusses his recent paper responding to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national broadband plan. William Dutton responds from a comparative perspective with a response to the Digital Britain Report. The paper responds to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national broadband plan. It argues that the US market for Internet services is working well overall, as evidenced by nearly ubiquitous coverage, rapid adoption, large investments, and increasing speeds. Still, the market is not working well for all people in all places, and the paper offers a framework for considering policies intended to mitigate those issues. The core of the paper consists of nine recommendations. Two of our recommendations are general. First, the governm...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Robert Hahn discusses his recent paper responding to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national US broadband plan Robert Hahn discusses his recent paper responding to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national broadband plan. William Dutton responds from a comparative perspective with a response to the Digital Britain Report. The paper responds to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national broadband plan. It argues that the US market for Internet services is working well overall, as evidenced by nearly ubiquitous coverage, rapid adoption, large investments, and increasing speeds. Still, the market is not working well for all people in all places, and the paper offers a framework for considering policies intended to mitigate those issues. The core of the paper consists of nine recommendations. Two of our recommendations are general. First, the government should ensure that its interventions do more good than harm. Second, the government should define clear, measurable, goals that do not benefit particular firms, technologies, or regions. The remaining seven recommendations provide specific guidance for a US broadband plan. They include: liberalizing spectrum, gathering and analyzing data on broadband demand, targeting resources to where they are most needed, defining broadband access to maximize social gain, designing mechanisms that will achieve the government's broadband goals at the lowest social cost, vigorous antitrust enforcement, and designing policies to facilitate rigorous evaluation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Robert Hahn discusses his recent paper responding to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national US broadband plan Robert Hahn discusses his recent paper responding to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national broadband plan. William Dutton responds from a comparative perspective with a response to the Digital Britain Report. The paper responds to the US Federal Communications Commission's request for guidance in designing a national broadband plan. It argues that the US market for Internet services is working well overall, as evidenced by nearly ubiquitous coverage, rapid adoption, large investments, and increasing speeds. Still, the market is not working well for all people in all places, and the paper offers a framework for considering policies intended to mitigate those issues. The core of the paper consists of nine recommendations. Two of our recommendations are general. First, the government should ensure that its interventions do more good than harm. Second, the government should define clear, measurable, goals that do not benefit particular firms, technologies, or regions. The remaining seven recommendations provide specific guidance for a US broadband plan. They include: liberalizing spectrum, gathering and analyzing data on broadband demand, targeting resources to where they are most needed, defining broadband access to maximize social gain, designing mechanisms that will achieve the government's broadband goals at the lowest social cost, vigorous antitrust enforcement, and designing policies to facilitate rigorous evaluation.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-11-13,25446265</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:56:53 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20091014_299/20091014_299.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, communication, Broadband, policy, Economics, social, market, Competition, fcc, Society, governance, Antitrust, 110, governmnet</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From Weblogs to Twitter: How Did We Get Where We Are Today and What Are the Main Impacts To Date?</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25446264-From-Weblogs-to-Twitter-How-Did-We-Get-Where-We-Are-Today-and-What-Are-the-Main-Impacts-To-Date</link>
      <description>What are the most important milestones in the evolution of social media? What factors have shaped their successes and limitations? Although the dates of the earliest 'weblog' are a matter of some debate, the majority of their growth in popularity has arisen over the past ten years. What are the most important milestones in that process of evolution, and what are the factors that have shaped the successes and limitations of social media? Why (if at all) should we expect them to have an inherently democratising or egalitarian effect? Each speaker concludes by identifying the most significant ways in which they think that blogs and social media have had any social, political or economic impact.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>What are the most important milestones in the evolution of social media? What factors have shaped their successes and limitations? Although the dates of the earliest 'weblog' are a matter of some debate, the majority of their growth in popularity has arisen over the past ten years. What are the most important milestones in that process of evolution, and what are the factors that have shaped the successes and limitations of social media? Why (if at all) should we expect them to have an inherently democratising or egalitarian effect? Each speaker concludes by identifying the most significant ways in which they think that blogs and social media have had any social, political or economic impact.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What are the most important milestones in the evolution of social media? What factors have shaped their successes and limitations? Although the dates of the earliest 'weblog' are a matter of some debate, the majority of their growth in popularity has arisen over the past ten years. What are the most important milestones in that process of evolution, and what are the factors that have shaped the successes and limitations of social media? Why (if at all) should we expect them to have an inherently democratising or egalitarian effect? Each speaker concludes by identifying the most significant ways in which they think that blogs and social media have had any social, political or economic impact.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-11-13,25446264</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090918_292/20090918_292.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Business, Technology, Media, News, Internet, twitter, Politics, communication, Blogging, social media, Community, journalism, democracy, weblog, citizen, reporting, 110</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using the Web to do Social Science</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25425681-Using-the-Web-to-do-Social-Science</link>
      <description>Duncan Watts discusses how the Internet is beginning to lift a long-time constraint of social science research on emergent collective behaviour: the difficulty of measuring interactions between people, at scale, over time, while also observing behaviour Social science is often concerned with the emergence of collective behavior out of the interactions of large numbers of individuals; but in this regard it has long suffered from a severe measurement problem - namely that interactions between people are hard to measure, especially at scale, over time, and at the same time as observing behavior. In this talk, Duncan will argue that the technological revolution of the Internet is beginning to lift this constraint. To illustrate, he will describe four examples of research that would have been extremely difficult, or even impossible, to perform just a decade ago: using email exchange to track social networks evolving in time; using a web-based experiment to study the collective consequenc...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Duncan Watts discusses how the Internet is beginning to lift a long-time constraint of social science research on emergent collective behaviour: the difficulty of measuring interactions between people, at scale, over time, while also observing behaviour Social science is often concerned with the emergence of collective behavior out of the interactions of large numbers of individuals; but in this regard it has long suffered from a severe measurement problem - namely that interactions between people are hard to measure, especially at scale, over time, and at the same time as observing behavior. In this talk, Duncan will argue that the technological revolution of the Internet is beginning to lift this constraint. To illustrate, he will describe four examples of research that would have been extremely difficult, or even impossible, to perform just a decade ago: using email exchange to track social networks evolving in time; using a web-based experiment to study the collective consequences of social influence on decision making; using a social networking site to study the difference between perceived and actual homogeneity of attitudes among friends; using Amazon's Mechanical Turk to study the incentives underlying 'crowd sourcing'. Although internet-based research still faces serious methodological and procedural obstacles, Duncan proposes that the ability to study truly 'social' dynamics at individual-level resolution will have dramatic consequences for social science.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Duncan Watts discusses how the Internet is beginning to lift a long-time constraint of social science research on emergent collective behaviour: the difficulty of measuring interactions between people, at scale, over time, while also observing behaviour Social science is often concerned with the emergence of collective behavior out of the interactions of large numbers of individuals; but in this regard it has long suffered from a severe measurement problem - namely that interactions between people are hard to measure, especially at scale, over time, and at the same time as observing behavior. In this talk, Duncan will argue that the technological revolution of the Internet is beginning to lift this constraint. To illustrate, he will describe four examples of research that would have been extremely difficult, or even impossible, to perform just a decade ago: using email exchange to track social networks evolving in time; using a web-based experiment to study the collective consequences of social influence on decision making; using a social networking site to study the difference between perceived and actual homogeneity of attitudes among friends; using Amazon's Mechanical Turk to study the incentives underlying 'crowd sourcing'. Although internet-based research still faces serious methodological and procedural obstacles, Duncan proposes that the ability to study truly 'social' dynamics at individual-level resolution will have dramatic consequences for social science.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-11-09,25425681</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:42:03 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20091023_301/20091023_301.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, research, web20, Society, Decision Making, interaction, behaviour, social networks, methodology, social science, 110</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The crisis of global capitalism: towards a new economic culture?</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25425680-The-crisis-of-global-capitalism-towards-a-new-economic-culture</link>
      <description>Manuel Castells draws on arguments from his book Communication Power in discussing the structural causes and implications of the 2008 economic crisis, and in claiming that we are moving, without much understanding, towards a new form of global capitalism The global crisis of capitalism that exploded in the Fall of 2008 is the most serious economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. It is rooted in the volatility of interdependent global financial markets resulting from deregulation, liberalization, and use of new communication and financial technologies. It has brought to a halt the period of growth largely based on consumer demand facilitated by easy credit. It has exposed the massive endebtedness of the leading capitalist governments, and highlighted the shift of economic power towards the Asian Pacific. The most immediate result of the crisis is the return of state intervention in the management of the economy, as the ideological belief in the capacity of financial m...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Manuel Castells draws on arguments from his book Communication Power in discussing the structural causes and implications of the 2008 economic crisis, and in claiming that we are moving, without much understanding, towards a new form of global capitalism The global crisis of capitalism that exploded in the Fall of 2008 is the most serious economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. It is rooted in the volatility of interdependent global financial markets resulting from deregulation, liberalization, and use of new communication and financial technologies. It has brought to a halt the period of growth largely based on consumer demand facilitated by easy credit. It has exposed the massive endebtedness of the leading capitalist governments, and highlighted the shift of economic power towards the Asian Pacific. The most immediate result of the crisis is the return of state intervention in the management of the economy, as the ideological belief in the capacity of financial markets for self-regulation has been shattered by the financial collapse. A new round of regulation is in the making but faces the difficult task of regulating global markets in the absence of a global regulator. In the Fall of 2009, the slowing of economic deterioration in the West and the continuation of Asian growth appear to alleviate the fears of a global depression. However, much of the current stabilization is due to unprecedented injection of public spending in the financial markets and in the economy at large, both in the West and in the East. The structural causes of the crisis are not being treated. It appears that we are moving, without much understanding, towards a new form of global capitalism in which the Washington consensus is being replaced by the London consensus.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Manuel Castells draws on arguments from his book Communication Power in discussing the structural causes and implications of the 2008 economic crisis, and in claiming that we are moving, without much understanding, towards a new form of global capitalism The global crisis of capitalism that exploded in the Fall of 2008 is the most serious economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. It is rooted in the volatility of interdependent global financial markets resulting from deregulation, liberalization, and use of new communication and financial technologies. It has brought to a halt the period of growth largely based on consumer demand facilitated by easy credit. It has exposed the massive endebtedness of the leading capitalist governments, and highlighted the shift of economic power towards the Asian Pacific. The most immediate result of the crisis is the return of state intervention in the management of the economy, as the ideological belief in the capacity of financial markets for self-regulation has been shattered by the financial collapse. A new round of regulation is in the making but faces the difficult task of regulating global markets in the absence of a global regulator. In the Fall of 2009, the slowing of economic deterioration in the West and the continuation of Asian growth appear to alleviate the fears of a global depression. However, much of the current stabilization is due to unprecedented injection of public spending in the financial markets and in the economy at large, both in the West and in the East. The structural causes of the crisis are not being treated. It appears that we are moving, without much understanding, towards a new form of global capitalism in which the Washington consensus is being replaced by the London consensus.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-11-09,25425680</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:39:28 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20091028_300/20091028_300.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, communication, Government, power, economy, Economics, markets, State, depression, credit, Society, capitalism, regulation, deregulation, financial crisis, 110</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Growth of the Corporate Blog: 'Letting go' of Information Control or Maintaining the Official Line?</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25425679-The-Growth-of-the-Corporate-Blog-Letting-go-of-Information-Control-or-Maintaining-the-Official-Line</link>
      <description>What do companies expect to gain from maintaining an online 'social media' presence? What are the implications of these trends for the development of traditional public relations strategies and business journalism? Blogs, Twitter feeds and even Facebook pages are increasingly featuring in the arsenal of public relations strategies employed by large corporations and public institutions. This is not an idle choice: corporate blogs at both Google and Apple have at times been the locus of intense media attention at times when new products have been announced or controversial decisions defended. Yet the use of such modes of communication raise peculiar challenges for companies willing to embrace new media, relating to the tensions between maintaining central control of information flows and the desire to react quickly when criticism arises in online networks or discussion groups. What do companies expect to gain from maintaining this sort of online presence and what are the implications ...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>What do companies expect to gain from maintaining an online 'social media' presence? What are the implications of these trends for the development of traditional public relations strategies and business journalism? Blogs, Twitter feeds and even Facebook pages are increasingly featuring in the arsenal of public relations strategies employed by large corporations and public institutions. This is not an idle choice: corporate blogs at both Google and Apple have at times been the locus of intense media attention at times when new products have been announced or controversial decisions defended. Yet the use of such modes of communication raise peculiar challenges for companies willing to embrace new media, relating to the tensions between maintaining central control of information flows and the desire to react quickly when criticism arises in online networks or discussion groups. What do companies expect to gain from maintaining this sort of online presence and what are the implications of these trends for both the development of traditional PR strategy and business journalism?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What do companies expect to gain from maintaining an online 'social media' presence? What are the implications of these trends for the development of traditional public relations strategies and business journalism? Blogs, Twitter feeds and even Facebook pages are increasingly featuring in the arsenal of public relations strategies employed by large corporations and public institutions. This is not an idle choice: corporate blogs at both Google and Apple have at times been the locus of intense media attention at times when new products have been announced or controversial decisions defended. Yet the use of such modes of communication raise peculiar challenges for companies willing to embrace new media, relating to the tensions between maintaining central control of information flows and the desire to react quickly when criticism arises in online networks or discussion groups. What do companies expect to gain from maintaining this sort of online presence and what are the implications of these trends for both the development of traditional PR strategy and business journalism?</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-11-09,25425679</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:29:07 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090918_296/20090918_296.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Business, Technology, Internet, communication, Social networking, Blogging, Collaboration, social media, public relations, journalism, web20, impact, Society, engagement, 110</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blogging at 20? The Future and Potential of Social Media</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25425678-Blogging-at-20-The-Future-and-Potential-of-Social-Media</link>
      <description>If social media are the defining advance of Web 2.0, whereby the network-as-platform enabled users not just to download content but to create it, tag it and share it ... what will the next decade hold? Will we continue to Tweet? If social media are the defining advance of Web 2.0, whereby the network-as-platform enabled users not just to download content but to create it, tag it and share it, what will the next decade hold? Many of the social media businesses whose tools we rely on have yet to make a profit, whilst concerns about privacy, security and possibly even dignity suggest that our online habits may have to change. The technology press has for some time been heralding the oncoming arrival of Web 3.0, as an era where the web gets 'smart', and research on the developing semantic web suggests that this is no idle prediction. But what will happen to social media in the interim? Will the next ten years see our fascination with blogging, wikis and social networks replaced by a re-...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>If social media are the defining advance of Web 2.0, whereby the network-as-platform enabled users not just to download content but to create it, tag it and share it ... what will the next decade hold? Will we continue to Tweet? If social media are the defining advance of Web 2.0, whereby the network-as-platform enabled users not just to download content but to create it, tag it and share it, what will the next decade hold? Many of the social media businesses whose tools we rely on have yet to make a profit, whilst concerns about privacy, security and possibly even dignity suggest that our online habits may have to change. The technology press has for some time been heralding the oncoming arrival of Web 3.0, as an era where the web gets 'smart', and research on the developing semantic web suggests that this is no idle prediction. But what will happen to social media in the interim? Will the next ten years see our fascination with blogging, wikis and social networks replaced by a re-focusing on the enhanced informational capacity of the Web or will we continue to Tweet?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>If social media are the defining advance of Web 2.0, whereby the network-as-platform enabled users not just to download content but to create it, tag it and share it ... what will the next decade hold? Will we continue to Tweet? If social media are the defining advance of Web 2.0, whereby the network-as-platform enabled users not just to download content but to create it, tag it and share it, what will the next decade hold? Many of the social media businesses whose tools we rely on have yet to make a profit, whilst concerns about privacy, security and possibly even dignity suggest that our online habits may have to change. The technology press has for some time been heralding the oncoming arrival of Web 3.0, as an era where the web gets 'smart', and research on the developing semantic web suggests that this is no idle prediction. But what will happen to social media in the interim? Will the next ten years see our fascination with blogging, wikis and social networks replaced by a re-focusing on the enhanced informational capacity of the Web or will we continue to Tweet?</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-11-09,25425678</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:25:05 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090918_298/20090918_298.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, communication, Social networking, Blogging, Collaboration, social media, web20, impact, Society, engagement, 110</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Internet Governance and Regulation: The Future of the Internet - and How to Stop It</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25259702-Internet-Governance-and-Regulation-The-Future-of-the-Internet-and-How-to-Stop-It</link>
      <description>What lies around the corner for the Internet .. and how do we avoid it? How can we study and affect the future of the Internet using the distributed power of the network itself? This is Jonathan Zittrain's inaugural lecture at the University of Oxford This inaugural lecture by Professor Jonathan Zittrain proposes a theory about what lies around the corner for the Internet, how to avoid it, and how to study and affect the future of the internet using the distributed power of the network itself, using privacy as a signal example. Jonathan Zittrain holds the Chair in Internet Governance and Regulation at Oxford University and is also the Jack N. and Lillian R. Berkman Visiting Professor for Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard Law School. His research interests include battles for control of digital property and content, cryptography, electronic privacy, the roles of intermediaries within Internet architecture, and the useful and unobtrusive deployment of technology in education.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>What lies around the corner for the Internet .. and how do we avoid it? How can we study and affect the future of the Internet using the distributed power of the network itself? This is Jonathan Zittrain's inaugural lecture at the University of Oxford This inaugural lecture by Professor Jonathan Zittrain proposes a theory about what lies around the corner for the Internet, how to avoid it, and how to study and affect the future of the internet using the distributed power of the network itself, using privacy as a signal example. Jonathan Zittrain holds the Chair in Internet Governance and Regulation at Oxford University and is also the Jack N. and Lillian R. Berkman Visiting Professor for Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard Law School. His research interests include battles for control of digital property and content, cryptography, electronic privacy, the roles of intermediaries within Internet architecture, and the useful and unobtrusive deployment of technology in education.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>What lies around the corner for the Internet .. and how do we avoid it? How can we study and affect the future of the Internet using the distributed power of the network itself? This is Jonathan Zittrain's inaugural lecture at the University of Oxford This inaugural lecture by Professor Jonathan Zittrain proposes a theory about what lies around the corner for the Internet, how to avoid it, and how to study and affect the future of the internet using the distributed power of the network itself, using privacy as a signal example. Jonathan Zittrain holds the Chair in Internet Governance and Regulation at Oxford University and is also the Jack N. and Lillian R. Berkman Visiting Professor for Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard Law School. His research interests include battles for control of digital property and content, cryptography, electronic privacy, the roles of intermediaries within Internet architecture, and the useful and unobtrusive deployment of technology in education.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-10-09,25259702</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:48:40 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20060411_141/20060411_141.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, icann, Government, Collaboration, Security, law, Community, future, public, Legislation, private, identity, grid, wikipedia, regulation, intellectual property, Surveillance, filtering, ietf, 110, wsis</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking News: The Changing Relationship Between Blogs and Mainstream Media</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25248034-Breaking-News-The-Changing-Relationship-Between-Blogs-and-Mainstream-Media</link>
      <description>Among the traditional media, blogs and other contributions to citizen journalism have for a long time been regarded as posing a significant threat to 'quality' news reporting ... is this a valid view? What (if anything) can social media offer? Among the traditional media, blogs and other contributions to citizen journalism have for a long time been regarded as posing a significant threat to 'quality' news reporting, whilst the global recession has shown that the threatened failure of high quality local and regional media outlets was not a groundless fear. Whilst some of the most successful social media sites are professional media productions such as CNN's Twitter news feed and the Huffington Post, many critics of social media now fear that the collapse of traditional business models will see a real decline in the depth and quality of news reporting, particularly at the local level. On the other hand, blogs and social media are seen as potentially democratising the production of new...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Among the traditional media, blogs and other contributions to citizen journalism have for a long time been regarded as posing a significant threat to 'quality' news reporting ... is this a valid view? What (if anything) can social media offer? Among the traditional media, blogs and other contributions to citizen journalism have for a long time been regarded as posing a significant threat to 'quality' news reporting, whilst the global recession has shown that the threatened failure of high quality local and regional media outlets was not a groundless fear. Whilst some of the most successful social media sites are professional media productions such as CNN's Twitter news feed and the Huffington Post, many critics of social media now fear that the collapse of traditional business models will see a real decline in the depth and quality of news reporting, particularly at the local level. On the other hand, blogs and social media are seen as potentially democratising the production of news, enabling fast, first-hand reporting often in areas where traditional media face political restrictions. This panel session will consider whether social media necessarily threaten traditional news media, and what, if anything they may have to offer in return. This is part of a series of recordings from the OII's Oxford Social Media Convention, held at the University of Oxford on 18 September 2009.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Among the traditional media, blogs and other contributions to citizen journalism have for a long time been regarded as posing a significant threat to 'quality' news reporting ... is this a valid view? What (if anything) can social media offer? Among the traditional media, blogs and other contributions to citizen journalism have for a long time been regarded as posing a significant threat to 'quality' news reporting, whilst the global recession has shown that the threatened failure of high quality local and regional media outlets was not a groundless fear. Whilst some of the most successful social media sites are professional media productions such as CNN's Twitter news feed and the Huffington Post, many critics of social media now fear that the collapse of traditional business models will see a real decline in the depth and quality of news reporting, particularly at the local level. On the other hand, blogs and social media are seen as potentially democratising the production of news, enabling fast, first-hand reporting often in areas where traditional media face political restrictions. This panel session will consider whether social media necessarily threaten traditional news media, and what, if anything they may have to offer in return. This is part of a series of recordings from the OII's Oxford Social Media Convention, held at the University of Oxford on 18 September 2009.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-10-07,25248034</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:07:56 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090918_293/20090918_293.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Business, Technology, Media, News, Internet, Politics, communication, Blogging, social media, quality, Community, journalism, public, citizen, reporting, 110, democratisation</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Parties, Campaigns and Representation: The Political Impact of Blogs and Social Media</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25248033-Parties-Campaigns-and-Representation-The-Political-Impact-of-Blogs-and-Social-Media</link>
      <description>Are social media tools likely to prove effective in engaging any voters except those who are already interested in politics? Is their apparent 'democratisation' of traditional party structures to be believed? The outcome of political careers and even campaigns is increasingly dependent on the successful mastery of new communication tools including social media. Many MPs and members of Congress are embracing the use of social networking tools to keep in touch with their constituents, whilst Facebook, YouTube and even Twitter have potentially changed the nature of election campaigns in reaching out directly to grass-roots supporters, with the recent US presidential campaign also showing how effective these tools might be in raising funds. At the same time, it is not clear whether these tools are likely to prove effective in engaging any voters except those who are already interested in politics, or whether their apparent 'democratisation' of traditional party structures is to be belie...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are social media tools likely to prove effective in engaging any voters except those who are already interested in politics? Is their apparent 'democratisation' of traditional party structures to be believed? The outcome of political careers and even campaigns is increasingly dependent on the successful mastery of new communication tools including social media. Many MPs and members of Congress are embracing the use of social networking tools to keep in touch with their constituents, whilst Facebook, YouTube and even Twitter have potentially changed the nature of election campaigns in reaching out directly to grass-roots supporters, with the recent US presidential campaign also showing how effective these tools might be in raising funds. At the same time, it is not clear whether these tools are likely to prove effective in engaging any voters except those who are already interested in politics, or whether their apparent 'democratisation' of traditional party structures is to be believed. This is part of a series of recordings from the OII's Oxford Social Media Convention, held at the University of Oxford on 18 September 2009.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Are social media tools likely to prove effective in engaging any voters except those who are already interested in politics? Is their apparent 'democratisation' of traditional party structures to be believed? The outcome of political careers and even campaigns is increasingly dependent on the successful mastery of new communication tools including social media. Many MPs and members of Congress are embracing the use of social networking tools to keep in touch with their constituents, whilst Facebook, YouTube and even Twitter have potentially changed the nature of election campaigns in reaching out directly to grass-roots supporters, with the recent US presidential campaign also showing how effective these tools might be in raising funds. At the same time, it is not clear whether these tools are likely to prove effective in engaging any voters except those who are already interested in politics, or whether their apparent 'democratisation' of traditional party structures is to be believed. This is part of a series of recordings from the OII's Oxford Social Media Convention, held at the University of Oxford on 18 September 2009.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-10-07,25248033</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:59:49 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090918_297/20090918_297.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Media, Internet, Politics, communication, Social networking, Blogging, Collaboration, democracy, public, voting, impact, Society, engagement, 110</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Media, So What? Assessing the Impact of Blogs and Social Media</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25248032-Social-Media-So-What-Assessing-the-Impact-of-Blogs-and-Social-Media</link>
      <description>Can Web 2.0 tools (eg blogs, social networking and wikis) enhance our democratic freedoms? Or can we dismiss the socially egalitarian and politically democratic potential of these social media? Have any significant social impacts been ignored so far? Theorists such as Yochai Benkler have suggested that the accessibility and inherently social nature of Web 2.0 tools such as blogs, social networking and wikis mean that we might expect them to enhance our democratic freedoms through the opening of new channels for debate and collaboration. Academic research suggests that such new opportunities have not been equally taken up, and that in many areas, new social media are simply being used by old 'elites'. At the same time, blogs and social media are having significant effect in enhancing accountability and transparency, particularly in repressive regimes like Burma and China. This session asks whether we should be so quick to dismiss the socially egalitarian and politically democratic po...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Can Web 2.0 tools (eg blogs, social networking and wikis) enhance our democratic freedoms? Or can we dismiss the socially egalitarian and politically democratic potential of these social media? Have any significant social impacts been ignored so far? Theorists such as Yochai Benkler have suggested that the accessibility and inherently social nature of Web 2.0 tools such as blogs, social networking and wikis mean that we might expect them to enhance our democratic freedoms through the opening of new channels for debate and collaboration. Academic research suggests that such new opportunities have not been equally taken up, and that in many areas, new social media are simply being used by old 'elites'. At the same time, blogs and social media are having significant effect in enhancing accountability and transparency, particularly in repressive regimes like Burma and China. This session asks whether we should be so quick to dismiss the socially egalitarian and politically democratic potential of social media or whether there might equally be more mundane but significant social impacts which have so far been ignored. This is part of a series of recordings from the OII's Oxford Social Media Convention, held at the University of Oxford on 18 September 2009.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Can Web 2.0 tools (eg blogs, social networking and wikis) enhance our democratic freedoms? Or can we dismiss the socially egalitarian and politically democratic potential of these social media? Have any significant social impacts been ignored so far? Theorists such as Yochai Benkler have suggested that the accessibility and inherently social nature of Web 2.0 tools such as blogs, social networking and wikis mean that we might expect them to enhance our democratic freedoms through the opening of new channels for debate and collaboration. Academic research suggests that such new opportunities have not been equally taken up, and that in many areas, new social media are simply being used by old 'elites'. At the same time, blogs and social media are having significant effect in enhancing accountability and transparency, particularly in repressive regimes like Burma and China. This session asks whether we should be so quick to dismiss the socially egalitarian and politically democratic potential of social media or whether there might equally be more mundane but significant social impacts which have so far been ignored. This is part of a series of recordings from the OII's Oxford Social Media Convention, held at the University of Oxford on 18 September 2009.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-10-07,25248032</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:54:39 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090918_295/20090918_295.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, Politics, communication, Social networking, Blogging, Collaboration, social media, Community, research, democracy, public, impact, Society, accountability, transparency, 110</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Making Science Public: Data-sharing, Dissemination and Public Engagement with Science</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/25248031-Making-Science-Public-Data-sharing-Dissemination-and-Public-Engagement-with-Science</link>
      <description>How have social media changed the nature of the scientific debate among scientists? Are they challenging the supremacy of editors, reviewers and science communicators? How have they impacted on engagement with the public understanding of science? Journals and peer-reviewed publications are still the most widely used channels through which research is disseminated within the scientific community and to a broader audience. However, social media are increasingly challenging the supremacy of editors, reviewers and science communicators. Blogging about science has become a new way of engaging 'the public' directly with researchers whilst researchers are increasingly using blogs within their own academic communities for peer-review purposes. Panellists give their perspective on how social media have changed the nature of the scientific debate among scientists, and how they have impacted on engagement with the public understanding of science. This is part of a series of recordings from the...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>How have social media changed the nature of the scientific debate among scientists? Are they challenging the supremacy of editors, reviewers and science communicators? How have they impacted on engagement with the public understanding of science? Journals and peer-reviewed publications are still the most widely used channels through which research is disseminated within the scientific community and to a broader audience. However, social media are increasingly challenging the supremacy of editors, reviewers and science communicators. Blogging about science has become a new way of engaging 'the public' directly with researchers whilst researchers are increasingly using blogs within their own academic communities for peer-review purposes. Panellists give their perspective on how social media have changed the nature of the scientific debate among scientists, and how they have impacted on engagement with the public understanding of science. This is part of a series of recordings from the OII's Oxford Social Media Convention, held at the University of Oxford on 18 September 2009.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>How have social media changed the nature of the scientific debate among scientists? Are they challenging the supremacy of editors, reviewers and science communicators? How have they impacted on engagement with the public understanding of science? Journals and peer-reviewed publications are still the most widely used channels through which research is disseminated within the scientific community and to a broader audience. However, social media are increasingly challenging the supremacy of editors, reviewers and science communicators. Blogging about science has become a new way of engaging 'the public' directly with researchers whilst researchers are increasingly using blogs within their own academic communities for peer-review purposes. Panellists give their perspective on how social media have changed the nature of the scientific debate among scientists, and how they have impacted on engagement with the public understanding of science. This is part of a series of recordings from the OII's Oxford Social Media Convention, held at the University of Oxford on 18 September 2009.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-10-07,25248031</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:49:33 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090918_294/20090918_294.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, communication, Blogging, Science, social media, Community, research, public, academia, 110, peer review</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Urban Informatics: The Internet, locative media and mobile technology for urbanites</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24746350-Urban-Informatics-The-Internet-locative-media-and-mobile-technology-for-urbanites</link>
      <description>Marcus Foth overviews various urban informatics projects, exploring the communicative ecology of urban residents, community engagement using public history and digital storytelling, and social navigation for mobile urban information systems Cities are exciting. Cities are buzzing. They are alive with movement. A rapid flow of exchange is facilitated by a meshwork of infrastructure connections: road systems, building complexes, information and communication technology and people networks. In this environment, the Internet has advanced to become the prime communication medium that connects many threads across the fabric of urban life. The increasing ubiquity of Internet services and applications has led many scholars to question the dichotomy between cyberspace and real space. New media and information and communication technology afford an increasingly seamless transition between mediated and unmediated forms of interaction. Driven by curiosity, initiative and interdisciplinary excha...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Marcus Foth overviews various urban informatics projects, exploring the communicative ecology of urban residents, community engagement using public history and digital storytelling, and social navigation for mobile urban information systems Cities are exciting. Cities are buzzing. They are alive with movement. A rapid flow of exchange is facilitated by a meshwork of infrastructure connections: road systems, building complexes, information and communication technology and people networks. In this environment, the Internet has advanced to become the prime communication medium that connects many threads across the fabric of urban life. The increasing ubiquity of Internet services and applications has led many scholars to question the dichotomy between cyberspace and real space. New media and information and communication technology afford an increasingly seamless transition between mediated and unmediated forms of interaction. Driven by curiosity, initiative and interdisciplinary exchange, 'urban informatics' is an emerging cluster of people interested in research and development at the intersection of people, place and technology with a focus on cities, locative media and mobile technology.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Marcus Foth overviews various urban informatics projects, exploring the communicative ecology of urban residents, community engagement using public history and digital storytelling, and social navigation for mobile urban information systems Cities are exciting. Cities are buzzing. They are alive with movement. A rapid flow of exchange is facilitated by a meshwork of infrastructure connections: road systems, building complexes, information and communication technology and people networks. In this environment, the Internet has advanced to become the prime communication medium that connects many threads across the fabric of urban life. The increasing ubiquity of Internet services and applications has led many scholars to question the dichotomy between cyberspace and real space. New media and information and communication technology afford an increasingly seamless transition between mediated and unmediated forms of interaction. Driven by curiosity, initiative and interdisciplinary exchange, 'urban informatics' is an emerging cluster of people interested in research and development at the intersection of people, place and technology with a focus on cities, locative media and mobile technology.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-07-03,24746350</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:18:52 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20070815_207/20070815_207.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, Design, communication, Mobile, location, Place, People, Information, History, Community, geography, city, public, Networks, urban, Society, planning, interaction, narrative, story telling, participation, informatics, visalization, locative media</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Second Life of Urban Planning</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24746349-The-Second-Life-of-Urban-Planning</link>
      <description>Marcus Foth demonstrates the value of various tools and services (eg Second Life) for engaging people in novel and participatory planning exercises, and for investigating how the public interpret and understand proposed urban designs and urban planning The majority of the world's citizens now live in cities. Although urban planning can thus be thought of as a field with significant ramifications on the human condition, many practitioners feel that it has reached a crisis in thought leadership. Conventional approaches to engage people in participatory planning exercises are limited in reach and scope. At the same time, sociocultural trends and technology innovation offer opportunities to re-think the status quo in urban planning. The notion of neogeography introduces tools and services that allow non-geographers to use advanced geographical information systems. Similarly, is a neo-planning paradigm without planners possible? This presentation traces a number of evolving links between...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Marcus Foth demonstrates the value of various tools and services (eg Second Life) for engaging people in novel and participatory planning exercises, and for investigating how the public interpret and understand proposed urban designs and urban planning The majority of the world's citizens now live in cities. Although urban planning can thus be thought of as a field with significant ramifications on the human condition, many practitioners feel that it has reached a crisis in thought leadership. Conventional approaches to engage people in participatory planning exercises are limited in reach and scope. At the same time, sociocultural trends and technology innovation offer opportunities to re-think the status quo in urban planning. The notion of neogeography introduces tools and services that allow non-geographers to use advanced geographical information systems. Similarly, is a neo-planning paradigm without planners possible? This presentation traces a number of evolving links between urban planning, neogeography and information and communication technology. Two significant trends - participation and visualisation - with direct implications for urban planning are discussed. Combining novel participation and visualisation features, the popular virtual reality environment Second Life is then introduced as a test bed for a series of workshops that engaged high school students in generating narratives with a view to make transparent how they understand and interpret proposed urban designs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Marcus Foth demonstrates the value of various tools and services (eg Second Life) for engaging people in novel and participatory planning exercises, and for investigating how the public interpret and understand proposed urban designs and urban planning The majority of the world's citizens now live in cities. Although urban planning can thus be thought of as a field with significant ramifications on the human condition, many practitioners feel that it has reached a crisis in thought leadership. Conventional approaches to engage people in participatory planning exercises are limited in reach and scope. At the same time, sociocultural trends and technology innovation offer opportunities to re-think the status quo in urban planning. The notion of neogeography introduces tools and services that allow non-geographers to use advanced geographical information systems. Similarly, is a neo-planning paradigm without planners possible? This presentation traces a number of evolving links between urban planning, neogeography and information and communication technology. Two significant trends - participation and visualisation - with direct implications for urban planning are discussed. Combining novel participation and visualisation features, the popular virtual reality environment Second Life is then introduced as a test bed for a series of workshops that engaged high school students in generating narratives with a view to make transparent how they understand and interpret proposed urban designs.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-07-03,24746349</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:16:53 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090604_287/20090604_287.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, Internet, Design, second life, communication, Place, People, Information, trends, Community, geography, city, public, Networks, urban, Society, planning, interaction, participation, informatics, visalization, virtual reality environment</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If Fiber is the Medium, What is the Message? Next-Generation Content for Next-Generation Networks</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24746348-If-Fiber-is-the-Medium-What-is-the-Message-Next-Generation-Content-for-Next-Generation-Networks</link>
      <description>By investigating price and capacity trends over the past century, Eli Noam shows that it is possible to predict the type, style, and genres of media content of a future ultra-broadband infrastructure, which allows a richer, more bit-intensive content The nature of content is critical for the economic viability of an ultra-broadband infrastructure. This paper asks what types of media content we will have when we achieve widespread fiber optic networks. In the past, an expansion of transmission capacity led to a 'widening' of the TV medium. But the impact of ultrabroadband will be a 'deepening' of the content to a richer, more bit-intensive content. The paper investigates, for 25 media, the price and capacity trends over the past century. It creates a model which shows the relationship of media prices per second over time, and the declining transmission cost per second and per GB. We find that the price people have been willing to pay for media entertainment per time unit has been fai...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>By investigating price and capacity trends over the past century, Eli Noam shows that it is possible to predict the type, style, and genres of media content of a future ultra-broadband infrastructure, which allows a richer, more bit-intensive content The nature of content is critical for the economic viability of an ultra-broadband infrastructure. This paper asks what types of media content we will have when we achieve widespread fiber optic networks. In the past, an expansion of transmission capacity led to a 'widening' of the TV medium. But the impact of ultrabroadband will be a 'deepening' of the content to a richer, more bit-intensive content. The paper investigates, for 25 media, the price and capacity trends over the past century. It creates a model which shows the relationship of media prices per second over time, and the declining transmission cost per second and per GB. We find that the price people have been willing to pay for media entertainment per time unit has been fairly steady over a century, adjusted for inflation, at about 4.4 cents per minute. The price of distribution of content has been dropping at a compound rate of 8%. This enables us to identify the trend of bits per second delivered - the 'richness' - of the media over time. It grows at about 8% per annum. Projecting this rate permits us to predict the type, style, and genres of media content of the near future. It also enables us to determine the time when media will become visually richer than 3-D real life in terms of sensory experience.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>By investigating price and capacity trends over the past century, Eli Noam shows that it is possible to predict the type, style, and genres of media content of a future ultra-broadband infrastructure, which allows a richer, more bit-intensive content The nature of content is critical for the economic viability of an ultra-broadband infrastructure. This paper asks what types of media content we will have when we achieve widespread fiber optic networks. In the past, an expansion of transmission capacity led to a 'widening' of the TV medium. But the impact of ultrabroadband will be a 'deepening' of the content to a richer, more bit-intensive content. The paper investigates, for 25 media, the price and capacity trends over the past century. It creates a model which shows the relationship of media prices per second over time, and the declining transmission cost per second and per GB. We find that the price people have been willing to pay for media entertainment per time unit has been fairly steady over a century, adjusted for inflation, at about 4.4 cents per minute. The price of distribution of content has been dropping at a compound rate of 8%. This enables us to identify the trend of bits per second delivered - the 'richness' - of the media over time. It grows at about 8% per annum. Projecting this rate permits us to predict the type, style, and genres of media content of the near future. It also enables us to determine the time when media will become visually richer than 3-D real life in terms of sensory experience.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-07-03,24746348</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:08:35 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20081113_267/20081113_267.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Television, Entertainment, Technology, Media, Internet, Broadband, trends, Economics, Networks, content, infrastructure, medium, fibre optic, sensory experience</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Negotiation and the Global Information Economy</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24746347-Negotiation-and-the-Global-Information-Economy</link>
      <description>JP Singh discusses the role played by diplomacy and negotiations in economic globalization, exploring possibilities for transformational problem-solving through multilateral diplomacy, allowing an adjustment of positions so that mutual gains will result JP Singh discusses aspects of his book 'Negotiation and the Global Information Economy'. What role do diplomacy and negotiations play in economic globalization? Many argue that great powers shape diplomacy to their advantage, others that, in a 'flat world', diplomacy helps everyone. Going beyond these polarized views, this book explores the conditions under which negotiations matter and the ways in which diplomacy is evolving in the global commercial arena. JP Singh argues that where there is a diffusion or decentralization of power among global actors, diplomacy can be effective in allowing the adjustment of positions so that mutual gains will result. In contrast, when there is a concentration of power, outcomes tend to benefit the ...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>JP Singh discusses the role played by diplomacy and negotiations in economic globalization, exploring possibilities for transformational problem-solving through multilateral diplomacy, allowing an adjustment of positions so that mutual gains will result JP Singh discusses aspects of his book 'Negotiation and the Global Information Economy'. What role do diplomacy and negotiations play in economic globalization? Many argue that great powers shape diplomacy to their advantage, others that, in a 'flat world', diplomacy helps everyone. Going beyond these polarized views, this book explores the conditions under which negotiations matter and the ways in which diplomacy is evolving in the global commercial arena. JP Singh argues that where there is a diffusion or decentralization of power among global actors, diplomacy can be effective in allowing the adjustment of positions so that mutual gains will result. In contrast, when there is a concentration of power, outcomes tend to benefit the strong. There will be little alteration in perception of interest, and coercion by strong powers is common. Singh's book suggests that there are possibilities for transformational problem-solving through multilateral diplomacy. Empirically, the book examines the most important information-age trade issues.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>JP Singh discusses the role played by diplomacy and negotiations in economic globalization, exploring possibilities for transformational problem-solving through multilateral diplomacy, allowing an adjustment of positions so that mutual gains will result JP Singh discusses aspects of his book 'Negotiation and the Global Information Economy'. What role do diplomacy and negotiations play in economic globalization? Many argue that great powers shape diplomacy to their advantage, others that, in a 'flat world', diplomacy helps everyone. Going beyond these polarized views, this book explores the conditions under which negotiations matter and the ways in which diplomacy is evolving in the global commercial arena. JP Singh argues that where there is a diffusion or decentralization of power among global actors, diplomacy can be effective in allowing the adjustment of positions so that mutual gains will result. In contrast, when there is a concentration of power, outcomes tend to benefit the strong. There will be little alteration in perception of interest, and coercion by strong powers is common. Singh's book suggests that there are possibilities for transformational problem-solving through multilateral diplomacy. Empirically, the book examines the most important information-age trade issues.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-07-03,24746347</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:05:23 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090508_284/20090508_284.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Internet, Politics, Information, power, Economics, trade, diplomacy, globalization, governance, negotiation, multilateral</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presumed Intentions and the Copyright Bargain: Digital Copyright Reform, the Making Available Right, and Implied Licence for Public Body Uses of Copyrighted Works</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24559080-Presumed-Intentions-and-the-Copyright-Bargain-Digital-Copyright-Reform-the-Making-Available-Right-and-Implied-Licence-for-Public-Body-Uses-of-Copyrighted-Works</link>
      <description>Elizabeth Judge analyses the extent to which the Crown is permitted to use (and make public) private copyrighted materials, considering in particular the theories of implied licence and waiver. Digital copyright reform discussions are considering the intersection between author's rights, including the making available right, and the public interest in accessing materials online. Mechanisms such as opt out, implied licence, waiver, and the copyright bargain have been suggested as ways to facilitate online public access to copyrighted materials. One area that tests the appropriate balance is public body uses of copyrighted works. As governments move toward increasing public online access to materials, the privacy implications for personal information in the posted material and the Crown copyright issues are beginning to be considered. This lecture will address the separate issue of the copyright implications for government-facilitated online access to materials in which copyright is o...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Elizabeth Judge analyses the extent to which the Crown is permitted to use (and make public) private copyrighted materials, considering in particular the theories of implied licence and waiver. Digital copyright reform discussions are considering the intersection between author's rights, including the making available right, and the public interest in accessing materials online. Mechanisms such as opt out, implied licence, waiver, and the copyright bargain have been suggested as ways to facilitate online public access to copyrighted materials. One area that tests the appropriate balance is public body uses of copyrighted works. As governments move toward increasing public online access to materials, the privacy implications for personal information in the posted material and the Crown copyright issues are beginning to be considered. This lecture will address the separate issue of the copyright implications for government-facilitated online access to materials in which copyright is owned by third parties. The lecture will analyse the extent to which the Crown is permitted to use private copyrighted materials and, in turn, the extent to which the Crown can make those works available to the public, considering in particular the theories of implied licence and waiver.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Elizabeth Judge analyses the extent to which the Crown is permitted to use (and make public) private copyrighted materials, considering in particular the theories of implied licence and waiver. Digital copyright reform discussions are considering the intersection between author's rights, including the making available right, and the public interest in accessing materials online. Mechanisms such as opt out, implied licence, waiver, and the copyright bargain have been suggested as ways to facilitate online public access to copyrighted materials. One area that tests the appropriate balance is public body uses of copyrighted works. As governments move toward increasing public online access to materials, the privacy implications for personal information in the posted material and the Crown copyright issues are beginning to be considered. This lecture will address the separate issue of the copyright implications for government-facilitated online access to materials in which copyright is owned by third parties. The lecture will analyse the extent to which the Crown is permitted to use private copyrighted materials and, in turn, the extent to which the Crown can make those works available to the public, considering in particular the theories of implied licence and waiver.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-05-14,24559080</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 02:19:47 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090506_282/20090506_282.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Government, digital, authors, licensing, copyright, rights, privacy, reform, Crown copyright, public access, waiver</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regulating Technologies</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24559077-Regulating-Technologies</link>
      <description>Roger Brownsword argues that the legal community should be concerned to contribute to debates about the implications and regulation of rapidly developing and converging technologies (eg ICTs, biotech / nanotech). Roger Brownsword argues that the emergence of a raft of rapidly developing technologies (ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies and neurotechnologies), together with the prospect of significant convergence between some or all of these technologies, should be of major concern to the legal community. One set of questions focuses on the regulatory environment in which these technologies first emerge before developing and moving on. What contribution can lawyers make to ensuring that the regulatory environment is fit for purpose? In particular, how well does law perform in controlling for the risks presented by these technologies; and how well does it perform in supporting the research, development, and distribution of these technologies? A second set of questions relates to t...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Roger Brownsword argues that the legal community should be concerned to contribute to debates about the implications and regulation of rapidly developing and converging technologies (eg ICTs, biotech / nanotech). Roger Brownsword argues that the emergence of a raft of rapidly developing technologies (ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies and neurotechnologies), together with the prospect of significant convergence between some or all of these technologies, should be of major concern to the legal community. One set of questions focuses on the regulatory environment in which these technologies first emerge before developing and moving on. What contribution can lawyers make to ensuring that the regulatory environment is fit for purpose? In particular, how well does law perform in controlling for the risks presented by these technologies; and how well does it perform in supporting the research, development, and distribution of these technologies? A second set of questions relates to the use by regulators of various kinds of technological fix, including fixing opportunities presented by developments in these emerging technologies. In addition to checking that technological fixes are legitimate and effective, what should the legal community make of the possibility that technology might displace law as an instrument of social control? In short, lawyers should be concerned to contribute to debates about getting the regulatory environment right for emerging technologies, but they should also be concerned about the implications of technology and design replacing law as a channelling mechanism. This lecture is part of a series organised in collaboration with the Society for Computers and Law (SCL) to provide a platform for leading international scholars to address emerging legal issues concerning the Internet: its use, governance and regulation.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Roger Brownsword argues that the legal community should be concerned to contribute to debates about the implications and regulation of rapidly developing and converging technologies (eg ICTs, biotech / nanotech). Roger Brownsword argues that the emergence of a raft of rapidly developing technologies (ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies and neurotechnologies), together with the prospect of significant convergence between some or all of these technologies, should be of major concern to the legal community. One set of questions focuses on the regulatory environment in which these technologies first emerge before developing and moving on. What contribution can lawyers make to ensuring that the regulatory environment is fit for purpose? In particular, how well does law perform in controlling for the risks presented by these technologies; and how well does it perform in supporting the research, development, and distribution of these technologies? A second set of questions relates to the use by regulators of various kinds of technological fix, including fixing opportunities presented by developments in these emerging technologies. In addition to checking that technological fixes are legitimate and effective, what should the legal community make of the possibility that technology might displace law as an instrument of social control? In short, lawyers should be concerned to contribute to debates about getting the regulatory environment right for emerging technologies, but they should also be concerned about the implications of technology and design replacing law as a channelling mechanism. This lecture is part of a series organised in collaboration with the Society for Computers and Law (SCL) to provide a platform for leading international scholars to address emerging legal issues concerning the Internet: its use, governance and regulation.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-05-08,24559077</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:40:22 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090330_278/20090330_278.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Technology, biotechnology, nanotechnology, law, ICT, risk, Society, regulation, governance, legal issues, Emerging Technologies, convergence</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Changing Business of Software</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24559076-The-Changing-Business-of-Software</link>
      <description>Michael Cusumano focuses on how both the enterprise and consumer software businesses have been changing over the past decade, building on observations made in his 2004 book, The Business of Software. This talk focuses on how both the enterprise and consumer software businesses have been changing over the past decade and builds on observations made in Professor Cusumano's 2004 book, The Business of Software. As documented in new research, a major change is the shift among software products-companies to a services and maintenance business. Another change is the increasing importance of non-traditional business models, where software products (or functionality once sold as products) is now offered as a service or as free to the end user and paid for indirectly through advertising or other revenue sources. Part of the reason for this shift is the ageing of software companies and the saturation and commoditization of many product markets. Another factor is the platform shift to the inter...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Michael Cusumano focuses on how both the enterprise and consumer software businesses have been changing over the past decade, building on observations made in his 2004 book, The Business of Software. This talk focuses on how both the enterprise and consumer software businesses have been changing over the past decade and builds on observations made in Professor Cusumano's 2004 book, The Business of Software. As documented in new research, a major change is the shift among software products-companies to a services and maintenance business. Another change is the increasing importance of non-traditional business models, where software products (or functionality once sold as products) is now offered as a service or as free to the end user and paid for indirectly through advertising or other revenue sources. Part of the reason for this shift is the ageing of software companies and the saturation and commoditization of many product markets. Another factor is the platform shift to the internet and web technologies, which has increased demand for services or allowed the appearance of new business models. Professor Cusumano recommends that product or technology companies develop a hybrid business strategy and focus on 'productizing services' as well as 'servitizing products'. He also predicts a serious future battle between IT services businesses and software product companies as they fight for service revenues, and recommends that IT services companies place a new emphasis on services R and D and innovation. The basis for these observations comes from a multi-year study through which we have compiled 10 or more years of annual financial data on publicly listed global software product firms (approximately 400) and IT services and computer hardware and telecommunications firms (approximately 500).</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Michael Cusumano focuses on how both the enterprise and consumer software businesses have been changing over the past decade, building on observations made in his 2004 book, The Business of Software. This talk focuses on how both the enterprise and consumer software businesses have been changing over the past decade and builds on observations made in Professor Cusumano's 2004 book, The Business of Software. As documented in new research, a major change is the shift among software products-companies to a services and maintenance business. Another change is the increasing importance of non-traditional business models, where software products (or functionality once sold as products) is now offered as a service or as free to the end user and paid for indirectly through advertising or other revenue sources. Part of the reason for this shift is the ageing of software companies and the saturation and commoditization of many product markets. Another factor is the platform shift to the internet and web technologies, which has increased demand for services or allowed the appearance of new business models. Professor Cusumano recommends that product or technology companies develop a hybrid business strategy and focus on 'productizing services' as well as 'servitizing products'. He also predicts a serious future battle between IT services businesses and software product companies as they fight for service revenues, and recommends that IT services companies place a new emphasis on services R and D and innovation. The basis for these observations comes from a multi-year study through which we have compiled 10 or more years of annual financial data on publicly listed global software product firms (approximately 400) and IT services and computer hardware and telecommunications firms (approximately 500).</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-05-08,24559076</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:39:03 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090326_281/20090326_281.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Business, Internet, Software, services, innovation, markets, users, business models, demand, web technologies</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trusted Computing Rants, Regrets and Research</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24559075-Trusted-Computing-Rants-Regrets-and-Research</link>
      <description>How do we build trustworthy hardware, and how can we use that to increase the trustworthiness of broader distributed computation? Sean presents some things he's learned, some things he wishes he had done differently, and some things he'd still like to do. How do we build trustworthy hardware, and how can we use that to increase the trustworthiness of broader distributed computation? These questions have followed Sean through a variety of venues in his career so far: academia, government, start-up, large industry, and academia again. In this talk, Sean presents some things he's learned, some things he wishes he had done differently, and some things he'd still like to do. Professor Sean Smith has been working in information security - attacks and defenses, for industry and government - since before there was a Web. His current work, as PI of the Dartmouth PKI Lab, investigates how to build trustworthy systems in the real world. This talk is a Keynote from the TRUST 2009 Conference (Un...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do we build trustworthy hardware, and how can we use that to increase the trustworthiness of broader distributed computation? Sean presents some things he's learned, some things he wishes he had done differently, and some things he'd still like to do. How do we build trustworthy hardware, and how can we use that to increase the trustworthiness of broader distributed computation? These questions have followed Sean through a variety of venues in his career so far: academia, government, start-up, large industry, and academia again. In this talk, Sean presents some things he's learned, some things he wishes he had done differently, and some things he'd still like to do. Professor Sean Smith has been working in information security - attacks and defenses, for industry and government - since before there was a Web. His current work, as PI of the Dartmouth PKI Lab, investigates how to build trustworthy systems in the real world. This talk is a Keynote from the TRUST 2009 Conference (University of Oxford, April 2009) which focused on trusted and trustworthy computing, both from technical and social perspectives.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>How do we build trustworthy hardware, and how can we use that to increase the trustworthiness of broader distributed computation? Sean presents some things he's learned, some things he wishes he had done differently, and some things he'd still like to do. How do we build trustworthy hardware, and how can we use that to increase the trustworthiness of broader distributed computation? These questions have followed Sean through a variety of venues in his career so far: academia, government, start-up, large industry, and academia again. In this talk, Sean presents some things he's learned, some things he wishes he had done differently, and some things he'd still like to do. Professor Sean Smith has been working in information security - attacks and defenses, for industry and government - since before there was a Web. His current work, as PI of the Dartmouth PKI Lab, investigates how to build trustworthy systems in the real world. This talk is a Keynote from the TRUST 2009 Conference (University of Oxford, April 2009) which focused on trusted and trustworthy computing, both from technical and social perspectives.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-05-08,24559075</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:37:58 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090407_280/20090407_280.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>trust, Security, hardware, computing systems, computer attacks, trusted systems, computer architecture</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trusted Computing: Questioning What You Think You Know</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24559074-Trusted-Computing-Questioning-What-You-Think-You-Know</link>
      <description>Eugene provokes us to question some assumptions related to computer architecture, the definitions of security, and how best to build trusted systems. Are current methods of defining security appropriate? How might we better design a system to be secured? A great deal of the trust we think we can place (or not) in our computing systems is based on experience with the ones we commonly use. However, those computing systems continue to be victimized by a variety of failures and attacks. Perhaps some of the 'common knowledge' on which we base our designs is itself faulty? Perhaps we are employing concepts that should be re-examined? In this talk, Eugene provokes the audience to question some assumptions related to computer architecture, the definitions of security, and how best to build trusted systems. In particular, we should question if the current methods of defining security are appropriate, how we might better design a system to be secured, and whether we understand the appropriate...</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Eugene provokes us to question some assumptions related to computer architecture, the definitions of security, and how best to build trusted systems. Are current methods of defining security appropriate? How might we better design a system to be secured? A great deal of the trust we think we can place (or not) in our computing systems is based on experience with the ones we commonly use. However, those computing systems continue to be victimized by a variety of failures and attacks. Perhaps some of the 'common knowledge' on which we base our designs is itself faulty? Perhaps we are employing concepts that should be re-examined? In this talk, Eugene provokes the audience to question some assumptions related to computer architecture, the definitions of security, and how best to build trusted systems. In particular, we should question if the current methods of defining security are appropriate, how we might better design a system to be secured, and whether we understand the appropriate tradeoffs when paying for heightened trust. Professor Eugene H. Spafford is one of the most senior and recognized leaders in the field of computing. He has an on-going record of accomplishment as a senior advisor and consultant on issues of security and intelligence, education, cybercrime and computing policy to a number of major companies, law enforcement organizations, academic and government agencies. This talk is a Keynote from the TRUST 2009 Conference (University of Oxford, April 2009) which focused on trusted and trustworthy computing, both from technical and social perspectives.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Eugene provokes us to question some assumptions related to computer architecture, the definitions of security, and how best to build trusted systems. Are current methods of defining security appropriate? How might we better design a system to be secured? A great deal of the trust we think we can place (or not) in our computing systems is based on experience with the ones we commonly use. However, those computing systems continue to be victimized by a variety of failures and attacks. Perhaps some of the 'common knowledge' on which we base our designs is itself faulty? Perhaps we are employing concepts that should be re-examined? In this talk, Eugene provokes the audience to question some assumptions related to computer architecture, the definitions of security, and how best to build trusted systems. In particular, we should question if the current methods of defining security are appropriate, how we might better design a system to be secured, and whether we understand the appropriate tradeoffs when paying for heightened trust. Professor Eugene H. Spafford is one of the most senior and recognized leaders in the field of computing. He has an on-going record of accomplishment as a senior advisor and consultant on issues of security and intelligence, education, cybercrime and computing policy to a number of major companies, law enforcement organizations, academic and government agencies. This talk is a Keynote from the TRUST 2009 Conference (University of Oxford, April 2009) which focused on trusted and trustworthy computing, both from technical and social perspectives.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-05-08,24559074</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:36:37 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090406_279/20090406_279.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>trust, Security, hardware, computing systems, computer attacks, trusted systems, computer architecture</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Online Audiences and the Paradox of Web Traffic</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24261920-The-More-Things-Change-the-More-They-Stay-the-Same-Online-Audiences-and-the-Paradox-of-Web-Traffic</link>
      <description>Using three years of daily Web traffic data, and new models adapted from financial mathematics, this talk examines large-scale variation in Web traffic. Using new models adapted from financial mathematics, Hindman examines large-scale variation in Web traffic and finds that web audience distribution is actually extremely stable. He discusses the implications for the openness of the online public sphere.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Using three years of daily Web traffic data, and new models adapted from financial mathematics, this talk examines large-scale variation in Web traffic. Using new models adapted from financial mathematics, Hindman examines large-scale variation in Web traffic and finds that web audience distribution is actually extremely stable. He discusses the implications for the openness of the online public sphere.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Using three years of daily Web traffic data, and new models adapted from financial mathematics, this talk examines large-scale variation in Web traffic. Using new models adapted from financial mathematics, Hindman examines large-scale variation in Web traffic and finds that web audience distribution is actually extremely stable. He discusses the implications for the openness of the online public sphere.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-03-06,24261920</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:29:59 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20090306_271/20090306_271.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Media, News, Internet, Economics, democracy, stock market, production, users, prediction, visualisation, Web traffic, modelling, web ranking</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook: The Strength of Weak Ties</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/24056178-Facebook-The-Strength-of-Weak-Ties</link>
      <description>Dr Bernie Hogan discusses his research on the social networking site Facebook, differences between online and offline relationships, how personal boundaries are regulated and the strength of weak ties.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr Bernie Hogan discusses his research on the social networking site Facebook, differences between online and offline relationships, how personal boundaries are regulated and the strength of weak ties.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Dr Bernie Hogan discusses his research on the social networking site Facebook, differences between online and offline relationships, how personal boundaries are regulated and the strength of weak ties.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2009-02-06,24056178</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:13:30 -0800</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/internet/oii/hogan-medium-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Internet, twitter, microsoft, myspace, Social networking, Facebook, E-Mail, online relationships</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Through the Network (of Networks): The Fifth Estate</title>
      <link>http://odeo.com./episodes/23556786-Through-the-Network-of-Networks-The-Fifth-Estate</link>
      <description>The Internet and web are creating a new space for networking people, information and other resources: this has the potential to become an important 'fifth estate' to support greater accountability in politics, the media and other institutional arenas.</description>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Internet and web are creating a new space for networking people, information and other resources: this has the potential to become an important 'fifth estate' to support greater accountability in politics, the media and other institutional arenas.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The Internet and web are creating a new space for networking people, information and other resources: this has the potential to become an important 'fifth estate' to support greater accountability in politics, the media and other institutional arenas.</itunes:summary>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:odeo.com,2008-09-12,23556786</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:20:39 -0700</pubDate>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/download/oii/20071015_208/20071015_208.mp3?CAMEFROM=podcastsRSS"/>
      <itunes:author>Oxford Internet Institute</itunes:author>
      <itunes:keywords>Media, Internet, networking, Politics, Government, People, Information, social, democracy, Society</itunes:keywords>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
